On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:11:50PM -0400, Andreas Wrede wrote:
> At the time, Chuck Silvers was investigating, here is the last  
> response I got from him:

oops, I didn't remember that I had looked into this before.
(chs@netbsd.org is me.)


> I am running the same array attached to other hardware, with a  
> 2.0_STABLE kernel and a size just below the 1TB mark, as Chuck  
> suggested. The second array is running a UFS2 filesystem just above  
> the 1TB mark, without problem.
> 
> For my part, the pr can be closed.  Chuck?

well, I still think we should do something to prevent other people
from stumbling into this.  I'll attach the previous email thread
to the PR since the email interface doesn't seem to be working.
and I'll see about fixing it for 3.0.

-Chuck