On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:56:50PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
> 
> Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> > Probably a shoot in the dark, I didn't think about it much, but ...
> > Does your sender/receiver processes make use of the network adapter ?
> 
> We don't actually hit the network adapter at all.  Here's "vmstat 1" as
> I start the program:
> 
>  procs     memory      page                       disks      faults          cpu
>  r b w     avm    fre  flt  re  pi   po   fr   sr f0 m0 c0   in     sy    cs us sy id
>  0 0 0 1032856 807988    6   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   25     80    12  0 0 100
>  0 0 0 1032856 807988    5   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   25    169    34  0 0 100
>  0 0 0 1032856 807988    5   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   21     73    11  0 0 100
>  2 0 0 1033028 807800   87   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   19 229411 58393  4 20 75
>  1 0 0 1033028 807800    5   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   20 278233 69764  3 27 70
>  1 0 0 1033028 807800    6   0   0    0    0    0  0  0  0   14 275263 69933  3 27 69
> 
> "netstat -i 1" also shows only localhost traffic.

And does 'systat vm' or 'vmstat -i' show anything odd about the interrupts ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--