Subject: Re: kern/32035: APIC timer help
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/28/2005 12:24:01
The following reply was made to PR kern/32035; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
To: Simon Burge <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: tech-kern@NetBSD.org, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
kern-bug-people@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/32035: APIC timer help
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:23:14 +0100
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:19:15PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>
> > And does 'systat vm' or 'vmstat -i' show anything odd about the interrupts ?
>
> "systat vm" shows "normal" looking interrupts to me - lots of softnet
> interrupts and not much else interesting. Here's a snapshot:
Yes, this looks good. And I don't think the interrupt aliasing problem will
affect software interrupts. AFAIK there is no hardware interrupt at a lower
priority than software interrupts on x86.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--