Subject: Re: kern/32205: Use standard units for memory/media sizes
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/01/2005 18:48:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/32205; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/32205: Use standard units for memory/media sizes
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:47:05 +0200
Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
> IMHO disks should stay with the binary units, but indeed should
> be labeled MiB or GiB. It's the HDD manufactures that are in the
> wrong here. Their product is sold by decimal bytes yet the real
> unit is sectors. The binary units are much better suited to
> measuring sectors.
I don't know any software except lynx, even not on NetBSD, that uses
these "KiB", "MiB", "GiB", etc. units.
In fact, the only times I've seen these units mentioned are a
few years ago in an OpenBSD list; I think they concluded with not using
these units but I may be wrong.
The second time is now.
Can we prefer convenience over correctness in this case and not
use these units? :)
-e.
--
Elad Efrat