Subject: Re: misc/32221
To: None <mishka@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Mike M. Volokhov <mishka@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 03/07/2006 17:40:02
The following reply was made to PR misc/32221; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: misc/32221
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:38:09 +0200
Okay, looking bit closer to our XML web-site I've found we are
relatively near the HTML 4.01 Transitional format. Most of pages now
can be built HTML compliant without further modifications (very often
"bug" is an <html xmlns=""> attributes which was recently almost
eliminated).
But our first problem is that XML files are completely invalid
themselves, and this may cause HTML validity breakage. In short summary:
- intensively used custom elements without DTD/schema support;
- using limited Simplified DocBook XML Customization DTD (man-refs problem);
Now I'm pretty sure the following way should be used here:
1. work close with <hrs> to achieve powerful and lightweight DTD;
2. support authors/editors with validity tools ("make valid");
3. work even close with <hrs> to provide correct XSLT stylesheets
for our own tags (Website XSL looks good enough already);
--
Mishka.