Subject: Re: port-i386/33492: wi(4) crash
To: None <port-i386-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Abrasive <abrasive@axdf.net>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 05/19/2006 01:20:03
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/33492; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Abrasive <abrasive@axdf.net>
To: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>,
gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-i386/33492: wi(4) crash
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:16:48 +1000
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:44:17AM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
>
> abrasive@axdf.net said:
> > > > pcic0: port 0x300-0x30f
> > pcic0: port 0x400-0x43f
Actually, I seem to have made a factual error... the wireless card leads to pcic0 port 0x400-0x43f in both slots - but my Xircom wired network adapter is the one that produces 0x300-0x30f.
Would forcing pcic0 to use the 0x30x port be advisable?
Also, PCMCIAVERBOSE unfortunately gave no new information.
A quick check of dmesg reveals that no devices are configured above 0x400, I suspect you're right about the ten-bit barrier...
Regards
James