Subject: Re: toolchain/34258: Cross building NetBSD 3.x with GCC 4.x fails
To: None <toolchain-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.org.uk>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 08/22/2006 17:30:03
The following reply was made to PR toolchain/34258; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.org.uk>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
Subject: Re: toolchain/34258: Cross building NetBSD 3.x with GCC 4.x fails
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:28:49 +0100
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:20:04PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR toolchain/34258; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
> To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, toolchain-manager@netbsd.org,
> gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: toolchain/34258: Cross building NetBSD 3.x with GCC 4.x fails
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:17:13 -0400
>
> On Aug 22, 2:35pm, tron@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk (tron@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk) wrote:
> -- Subject: toolchain/34258: Cross building NetBSD 3.x with GCC 4.x fails
>
> | >Number: 34258
> | >Category: toolchain
> | >Synopsis: Cross building NetBSD 3.x with GCC 4.x fails
> | >Confidential: no
> | >Severity: serious
> | >Priority: medium
> | >Responsible: toolchain-manager
> | >State: open
> | >Class: sw-bug
> | >Submitter-Id: net
> | >Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 22 14:35:00 +0000 2006
> | >Originator: tron@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk
> | >Release: NetBSD 4.99.1 2006-08-22 sources
> | >Organization:
> | Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
> | >Environment:
> | System: NetBSD lyssa.zhadum.org.uk 4.99.1 NetBSD 4.99.1 (LYSSA) #0: Tue Aug 22 09:11:34 BST 2006 tron@lyssa.zhadum.org.uk:/src/sys/compile/LYSSA i386
> | Architecture: i386
> | Machine: i386
> | >Description:
> | Building sources from the "netbsd-3" branch fails under NetBSD 4.x because
> | GCC 4.x is refusing to compile the toolchain:
> |
>
> We probably need to pullup the latest gcc-3.x to netbsd-3...
What about "netbsd-2"? It's probably broken in a similar way.
> This is why we imported the latest gcc-3.x in current in the first place.
The build failure is in "binutils", not in "gcc".
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/