The following reply was made to PR port-sparc/34585; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-sparc/34585: Weird behaviour of BLINK option
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:59:54 +0200

 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:35:00PM +0000, Andreas Wiese wrote:
 > But IMHO the behaviour isn't very intuitive.  Wouldn't it be better
 > instead of making the load average equivalent to the LED's blink
 > cycle, making it the blink frequency, i.e. higher load leads to a
 > higher rate?
 
 no, that just doesn't scale well (and is not visibly measurable) for
 higher loads.
 
 
 regards,
 
 --=20
 -- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --
 
 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)
 
 iD8DBQFFE+xaiwjDDlS8cmMRAoZBAJ9gI0yclrxK4S4pdl64F3Eoblx8WwCeMzs7
 9x2fymNwjzd64DYgS2gqnOI=
 =R7VJ
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--