Subject: Re: port-sparc/34585: Weird behaviour of BLINK option
To: None <port-sparc-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 09/22/2006 16:55:02
The following reply was made to PR port-sparc/34585; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-sparc-maintainer@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-sparc/34585: Weird behaviour of BLINK option
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:53:18 +0200
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:35:00PM +0000, Andreas Wiese wrote:
> >Description:
>
> I just got my SPARCstation 20 running with NetBSD/sparc and enabled the
> BLINK option in kernel config. =20
>
> But IMHO the behaviour isn't very intuitive. Wouldn't it be better
> instead of making the load average equivalent to the LED's blink cycle,
> making it the blink frequency, i.e. higher load leads to a higher rate?
>
> I discussed this with some guy of the BSD-Crew resp. the Chaos Computer
> Club Dresden, and he looks at this the same way.
I find it quite intuitive: the slower the computer is, the slower it blinks.
--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--