The following reply was made to PR install/15003; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Tritthardt?= <Juergen.Tritthart@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: install/15003 (sysinst generated scripts are not OK)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:51:25 +0200

 ------=neXtPaRt_1159198593
 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
 
 David Laight wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR install/15003; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: install/15003 (sysinst generated scripts are not OK)
 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:30:44 +0100
 > 
 >  On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 04:59:51AM +0000, jmcneill@netbsd.org wrote:
 >  > Synopsis: sysinst generated scripts are not OK
 >  > 
 >  > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 >  > State-Changed-By: jmcneill@netbsd.org
 >  > State-Changed-When: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:59:49 +0000
 >  > State-Changed-Why:
 >  > Much has changed since NetBSD 1.5.2; is this still an issue?
 
 Not for me, I don't use 1.5.2 anymore. Didn't try to reproduce it with 
 newer versions.
 
 >  The sysinst 'scripts' don't contain all the stuff that sysinst does.
 >  I've sometimes considered deleting the code that tries to generate them.
 >  Then sysinst could use the kernell interfaces to do work, instead of
 >  having to use system("shell command") which it dos now.
 
 As a beginner I found it usefull seeing what is happening during 
 install. On the otherhand, if the script is not completely documenting 
 what's happening it's inconsistent and should imho not be generated.
 
 
 	Jürgen
 -- 
 Jürgen Tritthardt              Max-Planck-Institut für med. Forschung
 Tel. 06221/486279                          Abt. Biomedizinische Optik
 Fax. 06221/486225                       Jahnstr. 29, 69120 Heidelberg
 
 ------=neXtPaRt_1159198593
 Content-Type: text/plain;
 
 AV scanned by FortiGate
 
 ------=neXtPaRt_1159198593--