Subject: Re: bin/9742
To: None <perry@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org,>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 09/25/2006 22:55:02
The following reply was made to PR bin/9742; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, perry@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, jhawk@mit.edu
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/9742
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:51:24 -0400

 On Sep 25, 10:00pm, danieldk@pobox.com (Daniel de Kok) wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: bin/9742
 
 | The following reply was made to PR bin/9742; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: Daniel de Kok <danieldk@pobox.com>
 | To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 | Cc: 
 | Subject: Re: bin/9742
 | Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:57:59 +0200
 | 
 |  --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
 |  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 |  Content-Disposition: inline
 |  
 |  How about this fix based on OpenBSD whatis(1)?
 
 That looks fine to me. I would test it by checking the results before
 and after the fix before committing.
 
 christos