Subject: Re: bin/9742
To: None <perry@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org,>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 09/25/2006 22:55:02
The following reply was made to PR bin/9742; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, perry@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, jhawk@mit.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/9742
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:51:24 -0400
On Sep 25, 10:00pm, danieldk@pobox.com (Daniel de Kok) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bin/9742
| The following reply was made to PR bin/9742; it has been noted by GNATS.
|
| From: Daniel de Kok <danieldk@pobox.com>
| To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
| Cc:
| Subject: Re: bin/9742
| Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:57:59 +0200
|
| --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
| Content-Disposition: inline
|
| How about this fix based on OpenBSD whatis(1)?
That looks fine to me. I would test it by checking the results before
and after the fix before committing.
christos