The following reply was made to PR kern/32166; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/32166
Date: Fri,  3 Nov 2006 00:59:22 +0900 (JST)

 > The following reply was made to PR kern/32166; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: kern/32166
 > Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:04:11 +0100
 > 
 >  >        2. in the case of !PGO_LOCKED, uvn_get ignores PGO_DONTCARE,
 >  >           while uao_get honours it.
 >  
 >  Isn't that reversed?  I mean, it should be PGO_LOCKED because  AFAICS
 >  from uao_get, PGO_DONTCARE is honored in the PGO_LOCKED case (at least
 >  in uvm_aobj.c:951, v1.82).
 
 i don't understand what you mean.
 in the case of PGO_LOCKED, uvn_get (genfs_getpages) honors PGO_DONTCARE.
 so there is no inconsistency between pagers.
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi