> The following reply was made to PR kern/32166; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com>
> To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: kern/32166
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:04:11 +0100
> 
>  >        2. in the case of !PGO_LOCKED, uvn_get ignores PGO_DONTCARE,
>  >           while uao_get honours it.
>  
>  Isn't that reversed?  I mean, it should be PGO_LOCKED because  AFAICS
>  from uao_get, PGO_DONTCARE is honored in the PGO_LOCKED case (at least
>  in uvm_aobj.c:951, v1.82).

i don't understand what you mean.
in the case of PGO_LOCKED, uvn_get (genfs_getpages) honors PGO_DONTCARE.
so there is no inconsistency between pagers.

YAMAMOTO Takashi