The following reply was made to PR kern/34885; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: cube@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org,
	yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp
Subject: Re: kern/34885 (piixide.c 1.29 doesn't work)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:08:40 +0100

 On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:40:03PM +0000, Quentin Garnier wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/34885; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp
 > Subject: Re: kern/34885 (piixide.c 1.29 doesn't work)
 > Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:39:03 +0100
 > 
 >  --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf
 >  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 >  Content-Disposition: inline
 >  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 >  
 >  On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:40:04PM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 >  > The following reply was made to PR kern/34885; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >  >=20
 >  > From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
 >  > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 >  > Cc: cube@NetBSD.org, kern-bug-people@netbsd.org,
 >  > 	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, xtraeme@netbsd.org
 >  > Subject: Re: kern/34885 (piixide.c 1.29 doesn't work)
 >  > Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:36:31 +0900 (JST)
 >  >=20
 >  >  > Synopsis: piixide.c 1.29 doesn't work
 >  >  >=20
 >  >  > Responsible-Changed-From-To: kern-bug-people->cube
 >  >  > Responsible-Changed-By: cube@netbsd.org
 >  >  > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:33:46 +0000
 >  >  > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 >  >  > I'll handle it.
 >  >  >=20
 >  >  >=20
 >  >  > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 >  >  > State-Changed-By: cube@netbsd.org
 >  >  > State-Changed-When: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:33:46 +0000
 >  >  > State-Changed-Why:
 >  >  > I have analyzed the issue a few days ago; see
 >  >  > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/10/23/0003.html
 >  > =20
 >  >  what's the status of this?
 >  >  how about reverting the change?
 >  
 >  I'll revert the parts that try to switch to enhanced mode.
 >  
 >  I'm wondering about that part (which is actually the reason it was
 >  committed at first) that switch an AHCI controller into IDE mode.
 >  
 >  While the intent is good, I'm a bit shaky at the idea of changing
 >  a device's product ID (it is a side effect of the switch) after the
 >  kernel has booted.
 
 BTW, I'm working on an AHCI driver currently.
 
 -- 
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 --