Synopsis: update the guide for setting up RAIDframe on 2.0

Responsible-Changed-From-To: port-i386-maintainer->hubertf
Responsible-Changed-By: hubertf@netbsd.org
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:47:24 +0000
Responsible-Changed-Why:

Sorry for the late reply...

Can you please give more details of this - esp. what
disklabel do you mean, exactly?
The raid0 one? To my understanding (and by what I've experieenced), there
is no problem with having extra partitions defined in a disklabel
(if they are created at all, I'm not sure this is still true about
the latest NetBSD, can you confirm this?)
Booting shouldn't be affected by this in any case.

Can you point me at the passage of http://www.netbsd.org/guide/en/chap-rf.html
where you think care should be taken for this case?


 - Hubert


State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: hubertf@netbsd.org
State-Changed-When: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:47:24 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
need more data