Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag !=
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/08/2006 11:35:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/34699; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, christianbiere@gmx.de
Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag !=
UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:30:31 +0900 (JST)
> The following reply was made to PR kern/34699; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Christian Biere <christianbiere@gmx.de>
> To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag != UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:29:43 +0100
>
> Christian Biere wrote:
> > >Number: 34699
> > >Category: kern
> > >Synopsis: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag != UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
>
> This didn't happen again since then and I don't know what caused this in the
> first place. So if you say it's fixed, it's fixed. I cannot provide any other
> feedback than that.
>
> --
> Christian
were you using PAX_MPROTECT or minherit(2) when it happened?
YAMAMOTO Takashi