Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag !=
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/08/2006 11:35:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/34699; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, christianbiere@gmx.de
Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag !=
 UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
Date: Fri,  8 Dec 2006 20:30:31 +0900 (JST)

 > The following reply was made to PR kern/34699; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Christian Biere <christianbiere@gmx.de>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: kern/34699: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag != UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
 > Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:29:43 +0100
 > 
 >  Christian Biere wrote:
 >  > >Number:         34699
 >  > >Category:       kern
 >  > >Synopsis:       kernel diagnostic assertion "fault_flag != UVM_FAULT_WIREMAX"
 >  
 >  This didn't happen again since then and I don't know what caused this in the
 >  first place. So if you say it's fixed, it's fixed. I cannot provide any other
 >  feedback than that.
 >  
 >  -- 
 >  Christian
 
 were you using PAX_MPROTECT or minherit(2) when it happened?
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi