The following reply was made to PR kern/35196; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, kern-bug-people@netbsd.org,
	gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, perry@piermont.com
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/35196: sockets should die if addresses vanish
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:20:19 -0500

 On Dec 8,  5:25pm, reed@reedmedia.net ("Jeremy C. Reed") wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: kern/35196: sockets should die if addresses vanish
 
 | The following reply was made to PR kern/35196; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>
 | To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 | Cc: 
 | Subject: Re: kern/35196: sockets should die if addresses vanish
 | Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:21:55 -0600 (CST)
 | 
 |  A sysctl for dropping tcp is found via 
 |  http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~dheeraj/netbsd.html
 |  
 |  (As an alternative maybe?)
 
 This patch has been around too long and it is really useful. The enemy
 of the good is the best. We need to decide on how to incorporate it
 in the source tree. I still think that sysctl is hacky, but I don't
 have any better ideas.
 
 christos