Subject: Re: kern/35351 (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Elad Efrat <e@murder.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 04/07/2007 17:15:05
The following reply was made to PR kern/35351; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Elad Efrat <e@murder.org>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org, gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/35351 (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:12:57 +0200
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> is there a PR?
no.
> does veriexec serialize calls to fileassoc?
given how veriexecctl works, I don't think it needs to.
(I'm getting rather tired of this thread. if you think fileassoc is
dangerous, fine, do whatever you like: disable it, disable veriexec,
remove whatever code you want from the tree, I *really* don't care.
I do think, however, that this will probably be a bigger disservice to
the netbsd project and user community than you think, and suggest you
try to take a look at what critical bugs netbsd-4 will ship with before
you're blowing this issue beyond proportion. the only user of fileassoc
in netbsd-4 which I'm willing to "back up" is veriexec, and given the
ioctl() calls, triggering fileassoc_add(), happen in a userland "loop"
in a single execution thread, I don't see a problem.)
-e.