Subject: Re: kern/36710: panic: NFS assertion (SLP_VALID | SLP_DOREC)
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Tobias Nygren <tnn@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 08/01/2007 09:35:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/36710; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tobias Nygren <tnn@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp
Subject: Re: kern/36710: panic: NFS assertion (SLP_VALID | SLP_DOREC)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:31:32 +0200
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 06:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> what rsize and wsize are actually used in that case?
The manual page says "kernel managed" size. It's hard to tell.
I think wsize in the context of tcp mounts means window size.
At least according to what I can read from tcpdump. I will run
more dumps with various settings and see what I can come up with.
I would not be surprised if the client is doing something that
deviates from the RFCs. NFSv3 for example is not usable because
the client zeroes out the nanosecond part of the nfstime3
attributes, causing attribute mismatches. (We don't have any
export options that can work around this, do we?)