Subject: misc/36729: grammar/spelling newfs_sysvbfs(8)
To: None <misc-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: None <mattwala@gmail.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 08/04/2007 10:35:00
>Number: 36729
>Category: misc
>Synopsis: grammar/spelling newfs_sysvbfs(8)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: misc-bug-people
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sat Aug 04 10:35:00 +0000 2007
>Originator: Matthew Wala
>Release: 4.99.26
>Organization:
>Environment:
NetBSD waldo 4.99.26 NetBSD 4.99.26 (GENERIC) #2: Thu Aug 2 19:58:06 CDT 2007 root@waldo:/usr/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
>Description:
The newfs_sysvbfs(8) man page needs some corrections.
There should probably be a semicolon in the DESCRIPTION section where the comma currently is in the phrase "...must be labeled using disklabel(8), the proper fstype is...".
The BUGS section misspells the word "experimental" as "experimantal".
>How-To-Repeat:
man newfs_sysvbfs
>Fix:
--- newfs_sysvbfs.8.orig 2007-08-03 20:25:02.000000000 -0500
+++ newfs_sysvbfs.8 2007-08-03 20:27:40.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
Before running
.Nm
the disk must be labeled using
-.Xr disklabel 8 ,
+.Xr disklabel 8 ;
the proper fstype is
.Dq SysVBFS .
.Sh SEE ALSO
@@ -60,4 +60,4 @@
command first appeared in
.Nx 4.0 .
.Sh BUGS
-The sysvbfs support is still experimantal and there are few sanity checks.
+The sysvbfs support is still experimental and there are few sanity checks.