The following reply was made to PR misc/37612; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: misc-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: re: misc/37612: cpu_switchto(9) doesn't document 'returning' parameter 
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:36:59 +1100

    	
    Architecture: x86_64
    Machine: amd64
    >Description:
    	The cpu_switchto(9) man page declares the function as:
    	    lwp_t *cpu_switchto(lwp_t *oldlwp, lwp_t *newlwp);
    
    	But should now read:
    	    lwp_t *cpu_switchto(lwp_t *oldlwp, lwp_t *newlwp, bool returning);
 
 
 interesting...
 
 andy, what is this bool returning?  i notice that most
 platforms cpu_switchto() don't notice it..
 
 
 .mrg.