NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-i386/37193 (x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use improvement)
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/37193; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, port-i386-maintainer%NetBSD.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
ad%NetBSD.org@localhost,
port-xen%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/37193 (x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use
improvement)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:37:54 +0100
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:15:26PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:01:52PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > > Synopsis: x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use improvement
> > > >
> > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: port-i386-maintainer->yamt
> > > > Responsible-Changed-By: yamt%netbsd.org@localhost
> > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:45:50 +0000
> > > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
> > > > i'll take a look.
> > >
> > > here's a patch. can anyone test it on xen+amd64?
> >
> > You can't map the ptp read/write on Xen. But with this issue fixed,
> > it works fine. I used the attached patch on HEAD after the bouyer-xeni386
> > merge.
> >
> > --
> > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
> > NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
> > --
>
> thanks.
>
> the #ifdef in pmap_map_ptp is the only necessary change?
yes, and adding the needed function to the xen part of i386/include/pmap.h,
now that xeni386 uses this one too. From what I remember there was no
conflicts in x86/pmap.c
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index