NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/38667: cpuctl does not properly deal with AMD Phenom
The following reply was made to PR bin/38667; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Chris Gilbert <chris%dokein.co.uk@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
paul%whooppee.com@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/38667: cpuctl does not properly deal with AMD Phenom
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:17:56 +0100
Paul Goyette wrote:
> The following patch is necessary to enable cpuctl to properly identify
> my Phenom processor:
>
> Index: i386.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/usr.sbin/cpuctl/arch/i386.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 i386.c
> --- i386.c 15 May 2008 23:31:56 -0000 1.3
> +++ i386.c 16 May 2008 13:15:45 -0000
> @@ -983,7 +983,8 @@ amd_amd64_name(struct cpu_info *ci)
> extfamily = CPUID2EXTFAMILY(ci->ci_signature);
> extmodel = CPUID2EXTMODEL(ci->ci_signature);
>
> - if (extfamily == 0x00) {
> + switch (extfamily) {
> + case 0x00:
> switch (model) {
> case 0x1:
> switch (extmodel) {
> @@ -1093,6 +1094,17 @@ amd_amd64_name(struct cpu_info *ci)
> default:
> ret = "Unknown AMD64 CPU";
> }
> + break;
> + case 0x01:
> + switch (model) {
> + case 0x02:
> + ret = "Phenom";
I think this would have to actually be "Family 10h", as Opteron's also
report the same cpuid. See page 5 of:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/41322.pdf
If you're ok with that I'll check in the change.
I guess we should also pick-up and fix errata 298 if necessary.
Although that is more complex as I believe the registers have to be
updated on every core.
Thanks,
Chris
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index