NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/39094 (Add et (Agere ET1310/ET1301) network driver to NetBSD)
The following reply was made to PR kern/39094; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: jnemeth%cornerstoneservice.ca@localhost (John Nemeth)
To: Kaspar Brand <netbsd+gnats%velox.ch@localhost>,
gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/39094 (Add et (Agere ET1310/ET1301) network driver to NetBSD)
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:41:32 -0800
On Jan 6, 8:30pm, Kaspar Brand wrote:
} John Nemeth wrote:
} > } Finally, a last thing to note: I changed the device ID for the
} > } ET1301 controller on purpose - according to the data sheet, it's
} > } 0xed01, not 0xed0a (as in the DragonFly/OpenBSD sources). I can't
} > } verify with a real controller, however, since I only have a system
} > } with an ET1310.
} >
} > Data sheets can be and are often wrong. Can you check with some
} > of the other people that have this driver to see if there is a reason
} > for the discrepancy (such as empirical testing), please?
}
} Sorry, I was mixing things up - I changed the *description* of the
} controller in pcidevs (to "1301", as that's the correct identifier for
} the Fast Ethernet version). The device ID must be 0xed01 in any case, cf.
}
}
http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/?p=dragonfly.git;a=commitdiff;h=9852a485af9827da5130a97f18c9124248c25555
}
} and
}
}
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs.diff?r1=1.1195;r2=1.1196
}
} (it's also what you find in the Linux and Windows drivers from Agere
} itself). I assume it was a typo when you originally committed these changes.
Yes, probably. Corrected. Thanks.
}-- End of excerpt from Kaspar Brand
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index