NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: install/43954: 5.1 RC4 Installation CD doesn't work on IBM R31 - exec /sbin/init: error 2
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/43954; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matto Fransen <matto%matto.nl@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: install/43954: 5.1 RC4 Installation CD doesn't work on IBM R31
- exec /sbin/init: error 2
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:27:15 +0200
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:40:03AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-i386/43954; it has been noted by =
GNATS.
>=20
> From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc:=20
> Subject: Re: install/43954: 5.1 RC4 Installation CD doesn't work on IBM R=
31
> - exec /sbin/init: error 2
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:35:40 +0000
>=20
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 08:05:03AM +0000, matto fransen wrote:
> > Option 1 will be chosen in 0 seconds
> > booting cd0a:netbsd
> > 10089048+518916+618576 [521152+508996]=3D3D0xbb283c
> > WARNING: couldn't open /stand/i386/5.1/modules/something
> > Loading something WARNING: couldn't open /stand/i386/5.1/modules/som=
ething
> > =20
> > where "something" is a bunch of garbled characters
> =20
> Ah, it's from the bootloader.
> =20
> Hrm. Does the same CD work in other machines? One possibility is that
> it's corrupted somehow, although that admittedly seems unlikely if you
> see the same behavior from 5.1RC4 and 5.0.2.
Indeed. =20
I just tried the CD on a Toshiba Satelitte A200-237, there it works fine.
> The message should certainly not be garble.
> Does the file /boot.cfg on the CD contain garble? I think you can
> print (text) files from the bootloader but I don't remember how...
=20
I mounted it on the IBM R31 (running NetBSD 4) with mount /dev/cd0d=20
and /boot.cfg is flawless. So that seems not to be the problem.
Cheers,
Matto
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkyyymIACgkQOJ62+7VpM0Ib/QCghUWEJWNm+nHWXgbjKIkkK/mP
S7cAoIh2t6peddb3Yu9KAy9YzKdi/KHw
=cvoc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index