Re: port-atari/45831: devel/libffi-3.0.9 fails it's test on m68k (atari)

[Alan Hourihane <alanh%fairlite.co.uk@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-atari/45831; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh%fairlite.co.uk@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-atari-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, 
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-atari/45831: devel/libffi-3.0.9 fails it's test on m68k
 (atari)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:24:01 +0000

 On 16/01/12 18:45, Alan Hourihane wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-atari/45831; it has been noted by 
 > GNATS.
 >
 > From: Alan Hourihane<alanh%fairlite.co.uk@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: David Holland<dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>,
 >   port-atari-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 > gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >   netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: port-atari/45831: devel/libffi-3.0.9 fails it's test on m68k
 >   (atari)
 > Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:24:23 +0000
 >
 >   On 15/01/12 07:50, David Holland wrote:
 >   >  The following reply was made to PR port-atari/45831; it has been noted 
 > by GNATS.
 >   >
 >   >  From: David Holland<dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
 >   >  To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >   >  Cc:
 >   >  Subject: Re: port-atari/45831: devel/libffi-3.0.9 fails it's test on 
 > m68k
 >   >    (atari)
 >   >  Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:47:41 +0000
 >   >
 >   >    On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:05:00AM +0000, 
 > alanh%fairlite.co.uk@localhost wrote:
 >   >     >   When executing the testsuite in devel/libffi, NetBSD 5.1.1 for 
 > m68k
 >   >     >   fails some of the tests with the following output.
 >   >
 >   >    Do you know if it works on any other m68k netbsd (or non-netbsd)
 >   >    platform?
 >   >
 >   Yes, I posted to the Linux debian-m68k lists and there's only a couple
 >   of failures there.
 >
 >   return_sc.c (only when not -O0 - could be a compiler bug)
 >   nested_struct2.c
 >
 >   All others pass.
 >
 >   I've not tested another NetBSD m68k system though, but I'd expect to be
 >   similar problems.
 >
 >
 
 I've re-tested with libffi 3.0.10 and the NetBSD m68k patch as well as 
 they additional ones I mentioned. Unfortunately these are still failures....
 
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_12byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_16byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_18byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_19byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_20byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_24byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_4byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_64byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_6byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_7byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_8byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_double.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_float.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_longdouble_split2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_pointer.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint16.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint32.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_sint64.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint16.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint32.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/cls_align_uint64.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/huge_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct10.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct3.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct4.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct6.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct7.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct8.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct9.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/problem1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/stret_large2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/stret_medium2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct3.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct4.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct5.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct6.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct7.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct8.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 FAIL: libffi.call/struct9.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
 
 It seems the calling convention used for NetBSD is different from Linux 
 and therefore this will need investigation and fixing.
 
 Alan.