Re: kern/21072 (Kernel support for UFS2 should be optional)

To: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost,thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/21072 (Kernel support for UFS2 should be optional)
From: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:32:39 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: Kernel support for UFS2 should be optional

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:32:38 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Making FFSv2 optional independent of the rest of FFS would be
intrusive and it's not at all clear that it's worthwhile, on size
or any other grounds. If you (or someone) sends in patches, we'll
consider it; in the meantime I don't think it's particularly
desirable, so I'm going to close this PR.

Prev by Date: Re: lib/39631 (uvm_extern.h got corrupted to current)
Next by Date: Re: lib/41931 (log(-INFINITY) or log(-1.0) gives uexpected results)
Previous by Thread: Re: kern/21072 (Kernel support for UFS2 should be optional)
Next by Thread: Re: bin/21123 (UFS2 newfs(8) mismatch with disklabel(5))
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index