Re: port-i386/44995 (PAE cpu_load_pmap doesn't seem safe)

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

The following reply was made to PR port-i386/44995; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-i386-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
        netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, yamt%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/44995 (PAE cpu_load_pmap doesn't seem safe)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:20:04 +0000 (UTC)

 hi,
 
 > The following reply was made to PR port-i386/44995; it has been noted by 
 > GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: port-i386/44995 (PAE cpu_load_pmap doesn't seem safe)
 > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:05:51 +0200
 > 
 >  On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:14:53PM +0000, yamt%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 >  > Synopsis: PAE cpu_load_pmap doesn't seem safe
 >  > 
 >  > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 >  
 >  What about a pullup for netbsd-6?
 
 while i haven't checked the branch, i bet it's necessary.
 
 i appreciate if someone volunteer to test and request a pullup.
 running ./build.sh -j128 was enough to trigger the problem.
 (crash or silent reboot)
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi
 
 >  
 >  Bernd