NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/47806 ("Abort trap" when running Linux lddconfig)
The following reply was made to PR kern/47806; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, Thomas Klausner
<wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/47806 ("Abort trap" when running Linux lddconfig)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:41:34 +0100
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:20:01PM +0000, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> Index: linux_misc.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_misc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.224
> diff -u -r1.224 linux_misc.c
> --- linux_misc.c 11 Aug 2013 09:07:15 -0000 1.224
> +++ linux_misc.c 27 Aug 2013 21:01:06 -0000
> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@
> idb.d_reclen = (u_short)linux_reclen;
> }
> strcpy(idb.d_name, bdp->d_name);
> - idb.d_name[strlen(idb.d_name) + 1] = bdp->d_type;
> + *((char *)&idb + idb.d_reclen - 1) = bdp->d_type;
> if ((error = copyout((void *)&idb, outp, linux_reclen)))
> goto out;
> /* advance past this real entry */
FWIW I'd guess that the strcpy() can be replaced by a faster memcpy()
since the length must already be known.
Also (contradicting someone else) d_reclen has been calculated using
ALIGN() - probably best to only use ALIGN once.
If you write in into both places, add a comment to explain why.
David
--
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index