NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/50395: Loss of characters in serial port communication between gdb and kgdb_stub
The following reply was made to PR kern/50395; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vicente Chaves de Melo <vchaves%ymail.com@localhost>
To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>, gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/50395: Loss of characters in serial port communication
between gdb and kgdb_stub
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 00:20:47 -0200
On 02/11/2015 15:43, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Nov 2, 5:35pm, vchaves%ymail.com@localhost (Vicente Chaves de Melo) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: kern/50395: Loss of characters in serial port communication b
>
> | The following reply was made to PR kern/50395; it has been noted by GNATS.
> |
> | From: Vicente Chaves de Melo <vchaves%ymail.com@localhost>
> | To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> | Cc:
> | Subject: Re: kern/50395: Loss of characters in serial port communication
> | between gdb and kgdb_stub
> | Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:29:55 -0200
> |
> | Hey Christos,
> | about fix in function comshutdown () I stand by my suggestion.
> |
> | I believe that changing the flag IER_ERXRDY to IER_ERLS we will obtain
> | the following two benefits
> |
> | 1) there will be no more interruptions generated for this COM after the
> | shutdown. That would seem to be the intent of this part of the code.
> |
> | 2) Allow the user to enter the debugger even after the shutdown, sending
> | a BREAK on the serial port.
> |
> | I also believe that it wasn't such a wise idea to mix the com_shutdown
> | subject in the same PR problem with kgdb.
> | Wouldn't it be better if I open another PR to deal with this matter?
>
> Sure, I agree with the current changes. If you want, please open another
> PR to fix the shutdown issue in a better way.
>
> Thanks,
>
> christos
Hey Christos,
I noticed that you already applied the fixes, so I don't think it's
necessary to open a new PR.
I believe that this PR can be close.
Thank you very much
Vicente.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index