NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: standards/52343: wcsnrtombs missing man-page
The following reply was made to PR standards/52343; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: standards/52343: wcsnrtombs missing man-page
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:16:35 +0200
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--inPBxQAEC42AM40Jnn1LKsXe6MehWND2H
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="QCf9V45qVpLKm7UCrq17j2l6mGOw9h9oS";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Message-ID: <da8927fd-2e24-2c39-a8ad-91c016708ffa%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: standards/52343: wcsnrtombs missing man-page
References: <pr-standards-52343%gnats.netbsd.org@localhost>
<20170626160318.F018C7A2B6%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
<20170827122001.486177A269%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20170827122001.486177A269%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
--QCf9V45qVpLKm7UCrq17j2l6mGOw9h9oS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 27.08.2017 14:20, Leonardo Taccari wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR standards/52343; it has been noted b=
y GNATS.
>=20
> From: Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc:=20
> Subject: Re: standards/52343: wcsnrtombs missing man-page
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:17:03 +0200
>=20
> Hello Kamil,
> =20
> Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> > [...]
> > > +.Pp
> > > +The
> > > +.Fn wcsnrtombs
> > > +is an extension to the standard.
> > =20
> > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/wchar.h.ht=
ml
> >
> > [...]
> =20
> A bit sibylline but I think that's correct. I guess that the original
> FreeBSD man page meant: `is an extension to the ISO C standard.' in th=
is
> context (both in NetBSD man page, FreeBSD man page and Abhinav's patch=
> the STANDARDS section does not reference `IEEE Std 1003.1-2008').
> =20
> Or, am I missing something?
> =20
>=20
For clarity it's useful to specify that this is a POSIX standard
function, this implies extension to the ISO C standard which is in my
opinion redundant information. Specifying that this is just an extension
is misleading, as it might be NetBSD specific extension.
--QCf9V45qVpLKm7UCrq17j2l6mGOw9h9oS--
--inPBxQAEC42AM40Jnn1LKsXe6MehWND2H
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=J2U6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--inPBxQAEC42AM40Jnn1LKsXe6MehWND2H--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index