Re: port-arm/52666 (ARM spinlocks are suboptimal)

To: port-arm-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,maya%NetBSD.org@localhost,coypu%sdf.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/52666 (ARM spinlocks are suboptimal)
From: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:49:54 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: ARM spinlocks are suboptimal

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: maya%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:49:54 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Actual benchmark showed otherwise

Prev by Date: Re: kern/52598 (/proc/self/exe misbehaves if it's on a null mount)
Next by Date: Re: bin/52410 (Please make test support == as a syonym for =)
Previous by Thread: Re: kern/52598 (/proc/self/exe misbehaves if it's on a null mount)
Next by Thread: Re: bin/52410 (Please make test support == as a syonym for =)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index