NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-i386/52560 (gdb kernel backtrace fails to show function where trap occurred)
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/52560; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost>
To: maxv%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/52560 (gdb kernel backtrace fails to show function where trap occurred)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:18:39 +0200
maxv%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> Can you re-test with the fix I committed?
I see that the change was reverted, but since I had already started a
test run of source date 2018.02.23.09.00.56, I might as well report
the results. The change you committed did not fix the problem; the
function where the trap occurred was still not identified:
(gdb) bt
#0 maybe_dump (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c:746
#1 0xc011c48d in cpu_reboot (howto=260, bootstr=0x0)
at /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c:765
#2 0xc0c02a5a in vpanic (fmt=0xc10b0678 "trap",
ap=0xceae8d78 "\020\216\256\316\020\216\256\316\002")
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c:342
#3 0xc0c0288c in panic (fmt=0xc10b0678 "trap")
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c:258
#4 0xc011fdd8 in trap (frame=0xceae8e10)
at /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/trap.c:323
#5 0xc0114492 in alltraps ()
#6 0xceae8e10 in ?? ()
#7 0xc0168313 in sy_call (sy=0xc16cda40 <sysent+4160>, l=0xc22cd540,
uap=0xceae8f74, rval=0xceae8f6c) at /usr/src/sys/sys/syscallvar.h:65
#8 0xc01683e3 in sy_invoke (sy=0xc16cda40 <sysent+4160>, l=0xc22cd540,
uap=0xceae8f74, rval=0xceae8f6c, code=208)
at /usr/src/sys/sys/syscallvar.h:94
#9 0xc016868a in syscall (frame=0xceae8fa8)
at /usr/src/sys/arch/x86/x86/syscall.c:140
#10 0xc01006a9 in Xsyscall ()
(gdb)
In the commit messsage, you wrote:
> Otherwise DDB is unable to display a correct stack trace
> if a fault occurred in a function before the frame was pushed.
DDB _is_ able to display a correct stack trace, or at least it was at
the time when the PR was filed, as shown at the beginning of the PR.
The problem only affects gdb.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, gson%gson.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index