Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.

[Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>]

21.03.2018, 17:51, "Utkarsh Anand" <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>:
> 21.03.2018, 17:40, "Utkarsh Anand" <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>:
>>  The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/53113; it has been noted by GNATS.
>>
>>  From: Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>
>>  To: "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>,
>>          "port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost" <port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost>,
>>          "gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost>,
>>          "netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
>>  Cc:
>>  Subject: Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.
>>  Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:36:52 +0530
>>
>>   21.03.2018, 17:25, "Utkarsh Anand" <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>:
>>   > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/53113; it has been noted by GNATS.
>>   >
>>   > From: Utkarsh Anand <utkarsh009%yandex.com@localhost>
>>   > To: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
>>   > Cc: "gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
>>   > Subject: Re: port-amd64/53113: NetBSD_8.0_BETA/amd64 fails to boot.
>>   > Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:21:48 +0530
>>   >
>>   >  21.03.2018, 17:06, "Martin Husemann" <martin%duskware.de@localhost>:
>>   >  > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:34:24PM +0530, Utkarsh Anand wrote:
>>   >  >>  Thankfully, I didn't try them again. Turns out the images are faulty.
>>   >  >>  I tested them on virtualbox. Have a look at the screenshots:
>>   >  >
>>   >  > I have no idea what you are doing and why you are jumping to conclusions.
>>   >  > If you don't tell us what you did / tested and what happened, it is hard
>>   >  > to help.
>>   >  The hard disk images used for the running those virtual machine instances were generated from build.sh and they are unaltered. They haven't been touched by dd explicitly. This concludes that `dd` is not responsible for the fault. I think you understand it now.
>>   >
>>   >  Meanwhile I'm trying to recover the USB key on FreeBSD. It says that the device has bad superblock (Values in superblock disagree with first alternate). Do you know where the backup superblocks are located (for use with -b option). That would be really helpful right now.
>>   Leave it. I figured it out. Only that -b doesn't work in freebsd.
>>   >  >
>>   >  > Martin
>
> OK. Seems like I lost my USB key, but that's another issue.
> newfs -N /dev/da1s1a shows:
> super-block backups (for fsck_ffs -b #) at:
> 192, 716544, 1432896, 2149248
> but,
> fsck_ffs -b <insert one of those numbers here> /dev/da1s1a
> says that they are not file system super blocks.
> So, I guess, now I'll move on to cross-building once again, on another system.
Turns out these values for superblocks were wrong. I checked the correct values from my new build but and fsck_ffs could now detect a superblock at the new location. But, I still couldn't recover the drive. It wasn't able to write many blocks.

Meanwhile, this seems to be a cross build problem. Here are two more screenshots for the new build:
https://imgur.com/qSq20Ag
https://imgur.com/P0qpxnf
As you can see, it still has the same problem. But sysinst works. So, I tried installing NetBSD on a new raw disk image and it succeeded. But, upon subsequent
reboot, it showed me an error that the file system is read-only. I was not able to create new files. Turns out, if there weren't other errors present on my desktop and laptop, I might have crippled my ssd or hard disk as well. Next, I will download one of the daily builds and see if that works.