Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)

To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
From: Jared McNeill <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:33:32 -0300 (ADT)

Can this change be done in a way where we require explicit locators forattaching indirect child devices? I worry about driver probe functionssending crap over the i2c bus on boards where we've otherwise strictlydefined devices in the DT.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
  - From: Jason Thorpe

References:
- Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
  - From: thorpej

Prev by Date: Re: kern/51676 (Enhancement - interrupt support for RPI gpio, kevents for gpio.c, PPS driver for gpio, and more)
Next by Date: Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
Previous by Thread: Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
Next by Thread: Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index