NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/53640: getnstr(3) shall read at most n characters, not n-1
The following reply was made to PR lib/53640; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: lib/53640: getnstr(3) shall read at most n characters, not n-1
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:57:28 +0300
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 16:46:42 +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> > While the NetBSD curses(3) behavior might be defendable it diverges
> > from the idiom of gets(3) + fgets(3). fgets(3) is documented to read
> > at most N-1 characters and it does so.
Well, it looks to me that exactly opposite is true. The NetBSD
behavior uses the same idiom for fgets() and getnstr() as you pass the
buffer size in both cases.
In your test code you use A[4] with:
fgets(A, 4, stdin);
to read 3 characters, but:
getnstr(A, 3);
Which in the ncurses case, that you claim to be correct, also reads 3
characters, but only reads 2 with NetBSD curses. In other words, to
read 3 characters with NetBSD curses you need
genstr(A, 4);
which is nicely parallel to fgets(A, 4, ...)
Solaris - both its "traditional" curses (that one doesn't have
getnstr(), only wgetnstr()) and XPG4 curses - has the same behavior as
NetBSD. While its man page says:
The getnstr(), mvgetnstr(), mvwgetnstr() and wgetnstr()
functions read at most n characters. These functions are
used to prevent overflowing the input buffer.
[...]
n Is the maximum number of characters to read from
input.
it actually treats n as the complete buffer size and will read at most
n-1 characters, always NUL-terminating the buffer.
NetBSD manual actually does't say that it reads n characters, it says:
Calling getnstr(), wgetnstr(), mvgetnstr() or mvwgetnstr() is effectively
the same as calling getch() repeatedly until a newline is received or the
character limit limit is reached. Once this happens the string is NULL
terminated and returned in str.
and you can get into sophistry about what reaching the limit actually
means :), since the string needs to be NUL terminated (which is
explicitly stated) within the limit (which is NOT explicitly stated,
but is, I think, a natural interpretation, giving e.g. fgets), you can
argue that reading n-1 character is counted as reaching the limit n.
ncurses manual doesn't say anything about nul-terminating the input
string.
To sum it up
1) all manual pages that I checked suck at precisely specifying what
the functions actually do
2) observed NetBSD behavior looks a better, more consistent choice
-uwe
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index