Re: port-amd64/57265: Cross-build broken from Linux amd64 to NetBSD amd64

[Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw%lug-owl.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/57265; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw%lug-owl.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: port-amd64-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
	netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/57265: Cross-build broken from Linux amd64 to NetBSD
 amd64
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 20:47:44 +0100

 --ljj7eos5y5qd7glk
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Thu, 2023-03-09 17:50:02 +0000, Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost> wrote:
 > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 17:16:15 +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
 >=20
 > > Nothing in the build uses LD_LIBRARY_PATH,[*] and it is unlikely for
 > > nbmandoc to have been inadvertently linked against a libc that doesn't
 > > exist yet.  But from your build log, I see:
 >=20
 > It's not the nbmandoc, it must be the freshly built libz.so that gets
 > pulled in, and then that netbsd libz.so depends on (netbsd)
 > libc.so.12, which cannot be found.
 
 That's actually a good point: As NetBSD libz is found, but not NetBSD
 libc, it's probably _not_ picking it up from $destdir/lib, but from
 $PWD.  Just realized that, as it seems, the freshly libz isn't yet
 installed to $destdir, and if $destdir/lib were in LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
 that would have been found as well.
 
 MfG, JBG
 
 --=20
 
 --ljj7eos5y5qd7glk
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iF0EABECAB0WIQQlDTvPcScNjKREqWEdvV51g5nhuwUCZAo33QAKCRAdvV51g5nh
 uzMsAJ9E8PbhF7HZTEDZNspGpeStCcx7jACgjJtMCkqt94rTY0jfLuaMEySbxgg=
 =3B37
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --ljj7eos5y5qd7glk--