NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-i386/57641: -current/i386 no longer installs in 32 MB
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/57641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: port-i386-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gson%gson.org@localhost (Andreas Gustafsson)
Subject: Re: port-i386/57641: -current/i386 no longer installs in 32 MB
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 22:50:25 +0000
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 20:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost>
>=20
> It's probably not an satisfying answer but I don't think it's a valid test
> because DIAGNOSTIC uses a lot more memory and we shouldn't be shipping
> actual release kernels with it enabled.
How much more memory? DIAGNOSTIC is supposed to be reasonably cheap,
mostly cheap predicted-not-taken branches in assertions. Should we
move more things to DEBUG instead for expensive checks and higher
memory usage?
> Looking back over the history for the amd64 GENERIC kernel it seems like
> nobody has disabled it for any release since NetBSD 5 though which sucks.
What history did you check? It has always been disabled in every
release branch. See, e.g., this commit on the netbsd-9 branch:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC?rev=3D1=
.531.2.4&content-type=3Dtext/x-cvsweb-markup&only_with_tag=3Dnetbsd-9
I checked every branch back to netbsd-2 and found it disabled.
> Cc: releng people, do we have a procedure for releases somewhere that I
> could update?
I assume there must be a procedure somewhere that already has this!
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index