Re: lib/58391 (re-adding syslog_ss() to syslog.h and syslog.3)

[Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR lib/58391; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 "riastradh%netbsd.org@localhost" <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>,
 "soda%netbsd.org@localhost" <soda%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/58391 (re-adding syslog_ss() to syslog.h and syslog.3)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:50:32 -0400

 Yes, but we have to pull up all of it (including sets)
 
 christos
 
 > On Jul 23, 2024, at 4:49=E2=80=AFPM, riastradh%netbsd.org@localhost =
 <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
 >=20
 > Synopsis: re-adding syslog_ss() to syslog.h and syslog.3
 >=20
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->needs-pullups
 > State-Changed-By: riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > State-Changed-When: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:49:35 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > Should we pull this up to netbsd-9 and netbsd-10?  The symbols are
 > already there, so it's not actually a compatibility break in any
 > direction, I think.
 >=20
 >=20