Re: lib/57828 (strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important)

To: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost,alx%kernel.org@localhost
Subject: Re: lib/57828 (strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important)
From: riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:03:31 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important

State-Changed-From-To: pending-pullups->closed
State-Changed-By: riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:03:31 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
fixed in HEAD, pulled up to 10, pulled up to 9

Thanks for the report!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lib/57828 (strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important)
  - From: Alejandro Colomar

Prev by Date: Re: misc/57422 (Test for long double omitted in t_fpclassify automated framework cases)
Next by Date: Re: lib/57871 (CMSG_DATA uses u_char which is undefined when POSIX_C_SOURCE is set)
Previous by Thread: Re: lib/57828 (strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important)
Next by Thread: Re: lib/57828 (strtoi(3), strtou(3): When both ERANGE and ENOTSUP conditions happen, ERANGE should be more important)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index