Re: bin/58678: ntpd crashes on sparc64

["Christos Zoulas via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR bin/58678; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, martin%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/58678: ntpd crashes on sparc64
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:37:19 -0400

 > On Sep 20, 2024, at 2:10=E2=80=AFAM, Martin Husemann via gnats <gnats-admi=
 n%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 >=20
 > =EF=BB=BFThe following reply was made to PR bin/58678; it has been noted b=
 y GNATS.
 >=20
 > From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
 > To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: bin/58678: ntpd crashes on sparc64
 > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:06:29 +0200
 >=20
 >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:40:37PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
 >> Rather than listing architectures, what about keying off of __NO_STRICT_A=
 LIGNMENT?
 >=20
 > That is NetBSD specific, isn't it?
 > I had hoped there is a chance to upstream this change (the bug is not NetB=
 SD
 > specific).
 >=20
 Yes I would send it to harlan, but I would prefer that it was done more port=
 ably, i.e. arrange for the struct to be always aligned properly so that ther=
 e are no machine specific ifdefs.
 
 christos
 > Martin
 >=20