Re: toolchain/58737 (building against gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3) + glibc-2.39-22.fc40.x86_64)

["Andrew Cagney via gnats" <gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR toolchain/58737; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: toolchain-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: toolchain/58737 (building against gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red
 Hat 14.2.1-3) + glibc-2.39-22.fc40.x86_64)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:46:43 -0500

 The tools built cross compiler:
 
    /home/netbsd/10/tools/bin/aarch64--netbsd-c++
 
 compiled using the native compiler:
 
   cc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 + glibc-2.39
 
 (on fc40), barfed trying to compile:
 
 /home/netbsd/10/src/external/apache2/llvm/librt/libLLVMAMDGPUCodeGen/../../lib/../dist/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIRegisterInfo.cpp:14:
 /home/netbsd/10/evbarm64/destdir.evbarm/usr/include/inttypes.h:71:1:
 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
    71 | uintmax_t strtoumax_l(const char * __restrict,
       | ^~~~~~~~~
 
 On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 11:35, David H. Gutteridge via gnats
 <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 >
 > The following reply was made to PR toolchain/58737; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: "David H. Gutteridge" <david%gutteridge.ca@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: toolchain/58737 (building against gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red
 >  Hat 14.2.1-3) + glibc-2.39-22.fc40.x86_64)
 > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:22:17 -0500
 >
 >  This is effectively a duplicate of PR lib/58674. The changes and
 >  discussion were tracked there. Everything referenced in this ticket has
 >  either been pulled up to the netbsd-10 branch or pullup tickets have
 >  been submitted but not yet processed (as they will probably go in after
 >  branching 10.1).
 >
 >  The only outstanding question (not referenced so far in this PR, but on
 >  tech-toolchain) is this:
 >  https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-toolchain/2024/10/15/msg004547.html
 >
 >  It's unclear from that commentary at what stage the failure happens
 >  (i.e. in a tools build or after that point).
 >
 >  Dave
 >