NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
PR/56429 CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libc/sys
The following reply was made to PR kern/56429; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Taylor R Campbell" <riastradh%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%gnats.NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: PR/56429 CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libc/sys
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:10:37 +0000
Module Name: src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Sun Feb 9 17:10:37 UTC 2025
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/libc/sys: Makefile t_poll.c
Log Message:
t_poll: Expand tests of polling when other endpoint is closed.
This covers fifos, pipes, and sockets; reads and writes; and polling
when the endpoint is already closed as well as sleeping until the
endpoint is closed after a delay.
Unfortunately, there is disagreement right now between:
(a) POSIX,
(b) our poll(2) man page, and
(c) our implementation,
for many of these cases. And we recently changed the behaviour of
poll(2) on fifos between 9 and 10 (PR kern/56429: poll(2) should
yield POLLHUP when last writer to a fifo close()'s it) but didn't get
it quite right.
So I've annotated these test cases with xfails for all the cases I
think we're currently doing wrong -- under a justification from some
combination of POSIX, our own documentation, and/or a reasonable
interpretation of what the semantics _should_ be based on how read(2)
and write(2) will behave. These are mostly edge cases:
1. [pollclosed_pipe_*_write*] When the read side of a pipe is closed,
poll(2) on the write side currently returns POLLHUP|POLLOUT, which
POSIX forbids because it requires POLLHUP to be mutually exclusive
with POLLOUT. And our man page concurs with POSIX on this rule,
and has for a long time (going as far back as NetBSD 1.3 or
earlier, judging by https://man.NetBSD.org/NetBSD-1.3/poll.2).
=> Fixing this won't change whether anything wakes up earlier or
later -- it will only change which bits are set when the
wakeups happen.
2. [pollclosed_fifo*_immediate_readsome] When the write side of a
fifo was previously open with the read side, and has since been
closed before calling poll(2), poll(2) on the read side returns 0
instead of POLLHUP|POLLIN as it is expected to, even though
read(2) will return EOF without blocking.
=> Fixing this may lead to more wakeups than before, but only in
cases where read(2) would actually return immediately anyway.
3. [pollclosed_fifo*_delayed_*_read] When the write side of a fifo is
closed, poll(2) on the read side returns POLLHUP|POLLIN, as it is
expected to. But this state currently isn't persistent, even
though the behaviour of read(2) in returning EOF without blocking
is persistent.
=> Fixing this may lead to more wakeups than before, but only in
cases where read(2) would actually return immediately anyway.
That said, it turns out that we are correct, according to POSIX, in
not setting POLLHUP on a socket whose peer has been closed: POLLHUP
is only for devices, pipes, and FIFOs. So one of the issues I
reported in PR 59056 turns out to be bogus. (Also POLLHUP is only
for the reader side anyway, not for the writer side.)
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/poll.html
PR kern/59056: poll POLLHUP bugs
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.77 -r1.78 src/tests/lib/libc/sys/Makefile
cvs rdiff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 src/tests/lib/libc/sys/t_poll.c
Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index