Subject: Re: Should we use current DOCTYPE identifiers?
To: None <k.heinz.apr.fuenf@onlinehome.de>
From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-docs
Date: 04/18/2005 02:55:28
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Klaus Heinz <k.heinz.apr.fuenf@onlinehome.de> wrote
  in <20050417174008.GH1948@silence.homedns.org>:

k.> Hi,
k.> 
k.> at the moment almost all .xml files in htdocs/ (htdocs/share is not
k.> considered here) contain the public identifier
k.> 
k.>   "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Layout V2.2//EN"
k.> 
k.> The exceptions are
k.> - autolayout.xml
k.>     "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Autolayout V2.4.1//EN"
k.> 
k.> - ./developers/translate.xml
k.>     "-//NetBSD//DTD Website-based NetBSD Extension//EN"
k.> 
k.> I suppose that since we do not use "pure" docbook-website we should not
k.> use V2.2 or V2.5.0 (corresponding to docbook-website-2.5.0 which is now
k.> the official package in use).
k.> 
k.> Am I right, that
k.> 
k.>    "-//NetBSD//DTD Website-based NetBSD Extension//EN"
k.> 
k.> is the identifier we should use from now on?

 Yes, please use the last one if there is no specific reason.
 This is a "wrapper" DTD for docbook-website including man-refs.ent
 and developers.ent.

-- 
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCYqMQTyzT2CeTzy0RAg3AAJ9n5E7XimJfueXkbqBbN67iQynl7gCcC07Q
dfLybD+nffRz5fw2KzU5ZT4=
=LcuQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)----