Subject: Re: Should we use current DOCTYPE identifiers?
To: None <k.heinz.apr.fuenf@onlinehome.de>
From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-docs
Date: 04/18/2005 02:55:28
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Klaus Heinz <k.heinz.apr.fuenf@onlinehome.de> wrote
in <20050417174008.GH1948@silence.homedns.org>:
k.> Hi,
k.>
k.> at the moment almost all .xml files in htdocs/ (htdocs/share is not
k.> considered here) contain the public identifier
k.>
k.> "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Layout V2.2//EN"
k.>
k.> The exceptions are
k.> - autolayout.xml
k.> "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Autolayout V2.4.1//EN"
k.>
k.> - ./developers/translate.xml
k.> "-//NetBSD//DTD Website-based NetBSD Extension//EN"
k.>
k.> I suppose that since we do not use "pure" docbook-website we should not
k.> use V2.2 or V2.5.0 (corresponding to docbook-website-2.5.0 which is now
k.> the official package in use).
k.>
k.> Am I right, that
k.>
k.> "-//NetBSD//DTD Website-based NetBSD Extension//EN"
k.>
k.> is the identifier we should use from now on?
Yes, please use the last one if there is no specific reason.
This is a "wrapper" DTD for docbook-website including man-refs.ent
and developers.ent.
--
| Hiroki SATO
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCYqMQTyzT2CeTzy0RAg3AAJ9n5E7XimJfueXkbqBbN67iQynl7gCcC07Q
dfLybD+nffRz5fw2KzU5ZT4=
=LcuQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Apr_18_02_55_28_2005_151)----