----Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_21_00_30_14_2005_712)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Mike M. Volokhov" <mishka@apk.od.ua> wrote
  in <20050420100111.584a462c.mishka@apk.od.ua>:

mi> Thus, both <quote> and <blockquote> seems allowed to use as text
mi> formatting tags.
mi> 
mi> Next, please compare the following two exaples:
mi> 
mi>   <para>More information is available at:</para>
mi>   <para role="indented"><ulink url="URL"/></para>
mi> 
mi>   <para>More information is available at:
mi>     <blockquote><ulink url="URL"/></blockquote>
mi>   </para>
mi> 
mi> As you can see, with <blockquote> a structure of the source document is
mi> bit more logical.
mi>
mi> I just wish to show you my thoughts about why I'm use <blockquote>.
mi> But in any case, <note> is not appropriate tag here and you patch looks
mi> very well. So if you still prefer <para role="indented"> (or <para
mi> role="emphasized"> ;-) and there are no more comments, please commit it
mi> thus I may finish my translation.

 Ah, yup, it makes sense to me now.  <blockquote> in <para> is quite
 reasonable.  I think I turn down my suggestion in the previous
 mail and will commit it ;)

-- 
| Hiroki SATO

----Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_21_00_30_14_2005_712)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCZnWITyzT2CeTzy0RApzKAJ9xMUKBUXxsmt+apJvZBlHO8wGpDwCfRjDZ
2rG81y9v9WVtHa4yDLHAo20=
=njRO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Thu_Apr_21_00_30_14_2005_712)----