Subject: Re: adding an xml validate target
To: None <netbsd-docs@netbsd.org>
From: Simas Mockevicius <symka@NetBSD.vejas.lt>
List: netbsd-docs
Date: 04/27/2006 22:27:59
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:50:18PM +0300, Simas Mockevicius wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:10:29AM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > Simas Mockevicius <symka@NetBSD.vejas.lt> wrote:
> > =20
> > Oh, I see. I didn't think of that. Do you have an example of how we
> > would it? Maybe you could take one or two simple pages that we
> > currently have in XML format and redo them as you envision them with
> > php, so we can compare?
>=20
> Ok, I'll try to do this in day or so ;)
>=20
weel after two days sitting on php.net page, and a lot of tests, I decided
that this idea is'nt so good, as I thought :( if we choose PHP, then
we will have more programing, than rewriting. As we did in the past: switch=
ing
from HTML to XML, then from perl to xml and then again generating HTML...
and PDF library which now runs with PHP is more programming than converting=
..
of course - we can generate PDF, we can convert a lot of docs to PHP, maybe=
in the=20
future we will win, but today it is not for us - we can't do this :(
sad but true.
I was thinking that we can combine PHP and XML, but this is not the way...
So, the migration to PHP will die ;)
Simas.
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFEURs/UtlifAEIUUgRAvrjAKCJBLc1CEdLAxCWAcdPq514wvaeHwCcCmxG
Nai9Zhyd7/oeeEZbQvtf1sA=
=fZjN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--