On Wed, 3 May 2006 01:36:05 +0200 (CEST)
Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de> wrote:

> On Tue, 2 May 2006, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > Oops, it was wrong. wd9 makes sense.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> FWIW, I've re-generated the latest version, which is after going back to 
> wd9.

Oh dang it, I am sorry. Of course it is correct and handles about creation of a fake device.
Seems like I was way too tired reading the doc. I messed  up my server I was working on too
and it did not come up after shutdown. I should know better than that.
Sorry for the confusion again guys.

Marcin.