--Signature=_Sun__1_Jul_2007_13_26_20_-0500_rVfxdpskpmSUxVr.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:53:57 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <hrs@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> <dsieger@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote
>   in <20070627215723.GB25896@antipasto.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>:
> ds> > 	<para>
> ds> > 	  text ............
> ds> > 	  text.........
> ds> > 	  continuation..
> ds> > 	  text</para>
>  I have another opinion about this.  See
>  http://mail-index.netbsd.org/www-changes/2005/05/06/0000.html.

Hi,

If this is so as you wrote nothing can be changed as far as NetBSD is
concerned. You are not XML system designer, developer, and propagandist.
You remarks are sound and consistent. I cannot complain about XML to
you.

But you, and me, and others, we all have touched broader issue. Why in
the times of so powerful PCs a Man has to tailor himself to a Tool and
become de facto the Tool's Slave and not vice versa? It is, why the IT
Tools are not a Man's Slaves (or Man's tools)? What's wrong with the IT
world, the hell?!

PCs were invented to make our life easier, not tougher, as it is in this
notorious example.

Sorry, but if what you wrote is correct the XML tools are simply
a looney's B.S. And I'm not going to use them anytime, ever. Not
directly anyway. Farewell translations then. If I need them I'll do
them my way.

Regards,
pp

--
Przemysław Pawełczyk (p2o2) - pp_o2@o2.pl
P2O2 - http://pp.kv.net.pl, P2O2 Forum - http://www.p2o2.fora.pl/

--Signature=_Sun__1_Jul_2007_13_26_20_-0500_rVfxdpskpmSUxVr.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGh/HMD9+eS/1tsfYRApK8AJ409/zmLkCP680KvVVGZ0QE92iQEQCfQvK+
oJeJa/L5X5s1Kdb+XDpGKTo=
=xMWf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__1_Jul_2007_13_26_20_-0500_rVfxdpskpmSUxVr.--