The clue is in the question.

How about...one is reported in 1K blocks and the other is
reported in 512 byte blocks (ie 1/2 K blocks) ie, you'll see
twice as many 512 byte blocks as you would 1K blocks (since 1K is
1024 bytes)

Regards
Nigel
P.S. Was this overkill? *grin*

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 02:53:00PM -0700, sudog@sudog.com wrote:
> 
> As a normal user under this Duron 700, KX133 VIA blah blah system:
> 
> :douglas:14:43:47 ~# su -l marc
> :douglas:14:57:36 ~$ df
> Filesystem  512-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a      5943492   354898  5291418     6%    /
> /dev/wd0e     15847520  4240758 10814386    28%    /usr
> /dev/wd0f     16159518        2 15351540     0%    /doke
> kernfs               2        2        0   100%    /kern
> :douglas:14:57:38 ~$
> 
> Yet as root:
> 
> :douglas:14:33:55 ~# df
> Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a     2971746   177449  2645709     6%    /
> /dev/wd0e     7923760  2120379  5407193    28%    /usr
> /dev/wd0f     8079759        1  7675770     0%    /doke
> kernfs              1        1        0   100%    /kern
> :douglas:14:56:29 ~#
> 
> The user df is correct, definitely. disklabel is correct (and shows
> the 15MB/etc values.
> 
> Is there something I'm missing here? Like half my drive?
> 
> marc
> 
> 

--