Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0
To: Douglas Egan <degan@calcon.net>
From: None <collver@linuxfreemail.com>
List: netbsd-help
Date: 04/23/2001 09:46:03
/*
* The use of SHM_R and SHM_W is not portable. Neither Posix nor
* SUSv2 specify it. Solaris and Linux have them (as well as newer
* versions of NetBSD) but either do not document them (Solaris) or
* explicitly depreceate their use (NetBSD).
*/
written by martin@duskware.de
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:00:20AM -0500, Douglas Egan wrote:
> I just got Samba 2.2.0 running with NetBSD 1.5 Had a couple of issues
> and am looking for feedback.
> Here is a copy of email I sent to samba.org, but I haven't received an
> explanation yet. After making the change below the file compiled, but I
> am unsure if the change is correct. I didn't find the definitions for
> SHM_R and SHM_W anywhere in NetBSD.
>
> Anyone know ramifications of my modification? Samba 2.2.0 seems to be
> working nicely under 1.5
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug Egan
>
> *****************************************************
>
> Problems on NetBSD also.
>
> I don't know if this is correct, but it compiled, and is working so
> far.
>
> source/profile/profile.c SHM_R and SHM_W were undefined.
>
>
> The following 2 lines were added, (they were defined in shm.c in
> Solaris 2.7)
> /*
> * Permission Definitions.
> */
> #define SHM_R 0400 /* read permission */
> #define SHM_W 0200 /* write permission */
>
> Doug Egan
>
>
--
"Recycled food, it's good for the environment, and O.K. for you."